One question. Multiple perspectives. A visible record.
EX MULTIS routes each question to independent reviewers, compares their analyses, verifies key claims, and produces a transparent record — including areas of agreement and disagreement.
The review flowFive stages. A clearer answer.
The five review stages
01Route▤
We analyze the question and recruit a diverse, independent set of qualified reviewers.
→
02Separate◌
Experts respond independently, without seeing others’ answers.
→
03Compare◍
We identify where reviewers agree, where they differ, and why.
→
04Verify⌕
Claims are checked, sources reviewed, and evidence assessed for accuracy.
→
05Record▧
We publish the full record — analyses, evidence, and methodology — for anyone to explore.
Independence by design
Independent experts. Independent answers.
INTERSECT identifies the domain, jurisdiction, risk, authority order, and research depth first. LEX coordinates the governed route from the classified problem to the inspectable record; INTERSECT remains the first classification step within that route.
Each reviewer receives the same assignment and authorized context, plus a distinct role. It does not receive another reviewer's answer before submitting its initial report. That reduces anchoring and makes agreement meaningful rather than inherited. That is not the same as statistical independence.
Initial reports begin separately.
Provider and model identity remain attached.
Reports meet only at comparison and synthesis.
What stays visible
Agreement and dissent both make the record stronger.
✓
Where reviewers agree
Areas of agreement are clearly identified with their supporting evidence and reasoning, so you can see what is well grounded. Agreement, not truth.
Competing views are retained with their evidence and logic, so trade-offs and unresolved questions remain visible.
Alternative interpretations · Competing evidence · Open questions
Human authority
People make the call.
EX MULTIS does not certify that an answer is true, lawful, safe, or complete. It provides a transparent record of analyses, evidence, and areas of agreement and disagreement. The final judgment — and what to do with it — always belongs to you.
