Academic institutions · The model laboratory

Stop asking which model.
Start asking what the record can support.

EX MULTIS turns multi-model use into an accountable research workflow: distinct assignments, visible comparison, cited evidence, and disagreements that remain available to a researcher or instructor.

© EX MULTIS
Institutional research standard

Model access becomes a method.

No black-box answer. Each research run produces a reviewable trail that can support teaching, research integrity, and responsible use policies.

Explore the academic program →
01

Assign roles

Give independent systems separate research tasks.

02

Compare work

Test evidence, reasoning, agreement, and dissent.

03

Preserve sources

Keep claims and citations attached to their record.

04

Assess thinking

Evaluate a student's reasoning, not a single answer.

EX MULTIS · academic dossierEvidence recordResearch design
Source provenance
Competing readings
Methods note

Academic institutions · The research council

One research question.
Several capable readings.
One inspectable record.

Give students and faculty a structured way to use multiple AI systems without treating any single model as the authority. The work is compared, sourced, challenged, and preserved for review.

Course research questionWill expanded transit access improve housing affordability?Scope · sources · assignment criteria
Independent reading A

Policy analysis

+ Supply increases near transit

Effects vary by local zoning

+ Authority: municipal data

Cited · reasoning retained
Independent reading B

Evidence critique

+ Published studies support impact

Causation remains contested

+ Authority: peer-reviewed research

Cited · reasoning retained
Independent reading C

Source review

+ Current local record collected

Implementation facts incomplete

+ Authority: primary documents

Cited · reasoning retained
INTERSECTCompare
Retain dissent
Link evidence
Research record

Qualified finding

Evidence supports improved access, with local zoning and timing retained as material conditions.

Supporting sources
18
Challenging sources
7
Open questions
4
Inspect cited record →

Academic institutions · The seminar record

Teach students how
research survives disagreement.

The research process is the learning material: source collection, independent readings, counterarguments, and a conclusion whose limits can be discussed in seminar.

Seminar case

Housing, transit, and public benefit

Guiding question: When does proximity to transit lower household costs?

Week 04 · Evidence workshop
01Frame the question
02Gather primary and scholarly sources
03Compare independent readings
04Retain disagreements in the report
Student annotations

★ “A citywide effect may hide neighborhood variation.”

✦ “This claim depends on zoning being implemented.”

✧ “Evidence gap: household cost data is incomplete.”

Every note is linked to the underlying record.
Assessment-ready brief

What a student can show

  • What the evidence supports
  • What a capable reading challenges
  • Which sources matter
  • What remains uncertain
View teaching module →